Here is an interesting article about how law review editors select articles. As you would expect institutional authority -- credentials and prior placements -- are very important. Not surprising.
http://www.stthomas.edu/law/faculty/bios/pdf/articleselectionchristensen.pdf
It seems clear that hiring is not quided by moneylaw priciples. Nor is the selection of articles. Is anything in law teaching not wired? More importantly, what would a moneylaw system of law reviews look like?
No comments:
Post a Comment